How do I write a character’s physical description without it feeling unnatural and clunky? I’m able to describe their hair and body relatively easily because my writing puts emphasis on small movements and fidgeting, but I can’t describe faces.
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 03:27
Is the story set in a world where visible ethnic differences matter? Is it about sexual attraction? Then physical appearance may well play an important role, and could be worth mentioning.
Because, as I hope I’ve shown, some of the greatest writers ever have not been bothered to describe what their characters look like.
You know when people say ‘Show, don’t tell’? Thomas Wolfe was an incorrigible teller of stuff.
China's electric cars are cheaper, but is there a deeper cost? - BBC
If so, why? What’s so important about their appearance that you have to describe them to us?
I would echo Rachel Neumeier’s question in her fine answer:
If a character is a bit out of physical shape, there’s no need to point this out in advance.
Why do you want to write a character’s physical description?
Case Study #1a because he wouldn’t shut up: Thomas Wolfe
Free yourself from the need to describe what your characters look like.
Another is that he is determined to emphasise how this character’s inner soul is reflected in her face, perhaps by way of justifying why he’d described it in the first place. But he’s just telling us this stuff.
Why? Because it’s completely irrelevant to the stories that Kafka and Melville want to tell.
The other problem is specific to Wolfe himself: the reason why he was determined to tell you what his characters looked like is that they were based on people he knew—family members, friends, neighbours—and he was heroically but idiotically determined to render them in fiction with as much completeness and detail as he possibly could.
What should a young woman do to control sagging breasts?
Case Study #2: Naguib Mahfouz
This is because Amina’s submission to her husband is one of the themes of Palace Walk, and indeed the trilogy as a whole. He is a complacent and immensely confident philanderer, whereas she lives as though he is her faithful and wonderful husband, and her role is to treat him as though he’s perfect. She overlooks things like the obvious evidence that he’s been drinking wine all night, which is frowned upon for someone who claims to be as good a Muslim as he is, because she thinks he’s flawless.
FFS, Thomas Wolfe, enough with the face-describing!
Chinese EV Makers Pull Away From Tesla With Sales Gains - Barron's
(Donoghue went on to write the award-winning novel Room, which was later made into a 2015 movie of the same name, for which Brie Larson won the Best Actress Oscar, and Donoghue was nominated for the Oscar for her own screenplay.)
But if the story is mostly about what goes on inside the characters, and their physical appearance isn’t really that relevant… why mention it?
In the Irish novelist Emma Donoghue’s second novel Hood, the protagonist and narrator, Cara, is supposed to be rather on the large side, but the only way we know this is that she talks about how she habitually sweats and chafes, and gets red in the face, whenever she has to do even minimal exercise, plus (iirc) a couple of casual remarks by her deceased lover. Donoghue never actually tells us what she looks like.
Fans Furious After Caitlin Clark Announcement Before Paige Bueckers Matchup - Athlon Sports
So, does this really need to be a problem?
In the end, we always return to the same question:
Well, here’s Thomas Wolfe to show you how not to do it.
James Bond game 007 First Light gets first trailer - The Verge
Physical appearance should be worth mentioning if it matters to the story.
What do you want to do?
But that doesn’t mean that a character’s physical appearance is always completely irrelevant.
What are the most important skills a fine artist should develop in today's art world?
Why do we need to know what they look like at all?
There could be other cases. Is a character well-known for having an unusual appearance? Then it’s worth mentioning.
The problems with the above are manifold. (It goes on for two more pages.)
Which laptop should I buy if I can't use a specific AI tool on my phone like pictory.ai?
If I think of classic novels that I admire, like Kafka’s The Trial, or Melville’s Moby-Dick, in neither of those novels do I ever find out what the protagonist looks like.
You might find it liberating.
So, in terms of Mahfouz’s artistic intentions, it makes sense for us to know that Amina is portrayed as someone who, under other circumstances, wouldn’t need to be content with such a patriarchal asshole as Ahmad, but she is anyway—and that’s one of the things that drives the story.
Case Study #1: Thomas Wolfe
What’s it got to do with the story?
Do you feel it’s absolutely necessary to tell the reader what characters look like?
L.A. Dodgers, facing fan pressure, pledge $1M after immigration raids - The Washington Post
The book opens with Amina waiting for her husband to come home after a night on the town, and she is described as looking slender and still beautiful, whereas he is extremely well-groomed and also very overweight—because he doesn’t need to bother to keep in shape, since he has an extremely obedient and, indeed, subservient wife, who gets up every night at midnight, and waits up for him to come home around 1am, so that she can tend to his needs (i.e. take his socks off, among other things) and make sure he goes to bed in comfort.
One is that Wolfe is determined to tell you what the person looked like, and so the story grinds to a standstill while he does that.
Please tell us that you’re not also describing what a character’s face looks like, as if it directly reflects their innermost soul.
How to see Mars visit a bright star and the moon this June - Space
In the great Egyptian novelist Naguib Mahfouz’s 1956 novel Palace Walk, the first volume of his Cairo Trilogy, the physical appearance of the two principal characters, Ahmad Abd Al-Jawad and his wife Amina, is sketched fairly quickly but in detail in the first few pages.
Thanks, Thomas. The problem with the above is—